This is a technical analysis and breakdown of multiple options going up against one another. Here you can see the Battlefield 2042 Xbox Series X vs Xbox Series S comparison which will provide a direct visual showcase within the video. This is then filled out with the text based information detailed further down in this article.
This is to provide easier options for viewing, and context for when wanting to find out what exactly is going on between the various selections being shown upon the video. Mostly you get a visual display, and if you’d prefer to just read what’s present you can also see that in action which is a good mix of choices.
There’s not only a quick body of information text, but also a quick table area to provide fast details if you’re not wanting to dive deeply into the topic. With that, you can watch the video presentation right here, or head further back to find out more about what’s being displayed.
Xbox Series X |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Resolution | Dynamic 4k (3840x2160 to 1800p) | ||
Frame Rate | 60fps | ||
HDR (High Dynamic Range) | Yes | Xbox Series S |
|
Resolution | Dynamic 1440p (1300p to 1080p) | ||
Frame Rate | 60fps | ||
HDR (High Dynamic Range) | Yes |
Side by Side Comparison Technical Notes
A next generation comparison for the Xbox Series consoles. We have the Xbox Series X running at a dynamic 4k resolution that is mostly keeping its quality close to a native picture which does look fantastic. Then there’s the Xbox Series S which is reaching mostly a 1300p resolution in best case scenarios.
That actually does look fairly good, though you may notice jagged lines when there’s a lot going on in combat. There’s also some dialed back foliage and other minor effects on the Xbox Series S but the picture quality in general does look really good for the smaller console. Both of these offerings target 60fps for performance and feature HDR.
The Xbox Series X does exhibit some performance drop during moments that may last up to twenty seconds at a time in certain scenarios. The Xbox Series S seems to keep its performance at a smooth 60fps the entire time through which is fantastic. Both offer 128 player lobbies with cross-play and have the same or similar draw distances.
Description/Synopsis
It’s a war for resources across the world as the two remaining core super powers of the United States and Russia face off. You’ll be battling across unique fronts to protect the interests of both nations when it comes to resources, technical advantages and important elements of the future.
It features ever thrilling specialists that everyone is totally into, and that typical traditional multiplayer combat with 128 players alongside cross-play for the platforms. It features just multiplayer through Breakthrough and Conquest alongside the portal for old school modes. Then there’s a small zone area, but no single player campaign this time around.
Hopefully the comparison was helpful in understanding the changes that are being presented between these options. It can help greatly to have a quick visual presentation that’s lined up for a faster viewing.
This side by side comparison should really provide all of the info you need to know when it comes to matching up these choices and giving you the quick facts to see why they’re being placed up against one another. You can read a review of a related title below, or check out a game hub for further coverage as well. Don’t forget to check out the video content to see the experience in action.
Read our Battlefield 2042 Review
View our Battlefield Hub